Business regulation changes in Poland in August 2026 cover the EU Inc. proposal, new employment-law requirements, Employee Capital Plans, the tax treatment of commuting reimbursements and conflicting approaches to invoices mistakenly submitted to the National System of e-Invoices. Employers and finance teams should review internal procedures, payroll processes and system integrations.
Which business regulation changes in Poland matter most?
EU Inc. – should investors wait?
The EU Inc. proposal of 18 March 2026 would create an optional pan-European company form with online incorporation within 48 hours, a maximum cost of EUR 100 and no minimum share capital.
It would not introduce a common EU tax or employment regime, so companies registered in Poland would still follow Polish CIT, VAT and labour rules. The Regulation would apply only 12 months after entry into force, and there is still no binding launch date.
Read more: EU Inc. in Poland – new EU company structure
What is changing in employment law?
The amendment signed on 30 July 2026 simplifies the statutory definition of workplace bullying and raises minimum compensation to six times the statutory minimum wage. It enters into force three months after publication.
The contested provisions concerning the National Labour Inspectorate (PIP) remain binding until the Constitutional Tribunal rules. The CJEU also confirmed in Case C-110/24 that mandatory travel together in a company vehicle from a designated place can count as working time.
Read more: Labour law in Poland: key employment updates for 2026
What are employers’ PPK obligations?
At the end of June 2026, 4.4 million people were saving through Employee Capital Plans (PPK), with net assets of PLN 53.76 billion. Employers generally finance at least 1.5% of remuneration and may increase their contribution to a maximum of 4%.
Contributions must reach the financial institution by the 15th day of the following month. Before the 2027 automatic re-enrolment, previous opt-outs must be informed by the end of February, while contributions resume from 1 April unless a new opt-out is filed.
Read more: PPK Poland (Employee Capital Plans): employer obligations
Is commuting reimbursement taxable?
In its judgment of 12 March 2026, II FSK 775/23, the Supreme Administrative Court held that reimbursement of an ordinary home-to-work commute generally constitutes taxable employment income.
An exemption may apply where transport is organised by the employer using a bus designed for more than nine people including the driver. If taxable, the benefit must be included in employment income, PIT advances and PIT-11 reporting; treatment by the Polish Social Insurance Institution (ZUS) requires separate analysis.
Read more: Employee commuting cost reimbursement in Poland
What should a company do with an invoice mistakenly submitted to KSeF?
In July 2026, the Ministry of Finance indicated that a zero correction may be unnecessary if both documents can clearly be identified as the same invoice.
The National Revenue Information (KIS) took a stricter position in its ruling of 23 June 2026, pointing to a zero correction because of the risk under Article 108(1) of the VAT Act.
An invoice accepted by the National System of e-Invoices (KSeF) cannot simply be deleted or edited. The company should stop further automated submissions, compare the documents and fix the ERP or synchronisation error.
Read more: Invoice mistakenly submitted to KSeF in Poland
From 11 January 2027, workplace temperature limits in Poland will require employers to act when weather-related temperatures exceed 28°C indoors, or 25°C for specified physically demanding and outdoor work. Above 35°C indoors or 32°C for specified physically demanding outdoor work, the relevant work may not be performed if the excess is caused by weather conditions.
In this article:
What workplace temperature limits will apply from 2027?
The Regulation of the Minister of Family, Labour and Social Policy of 9 July 2026 (Journal of Laws 2026, item 927) introduces two levels of thresholds:
- above 28°C indoors – technical or organisational measures;
- above 25°C indoors for specified high physical exertion – technical or organisational measures;
- above 25°C outdoors – organisational measures;
- above 35°C indoors – work may not be performed if the excess is weather-related;
- above 32°C outdoors – the restriction applies only to specified physically demanding work covered by the regulation.
The lower thresholds apply where energy expenditure exceeds 1,500 kcal (6,280 kJ) for men and 1,000 kcal (4,187 kJ) for women per shift. Duties arise only when the temperature exceeds the threshold.
When must work stop?
The prohibition applies above 35°C indoors or 32°C for specified physically demanding outdoor work where the temperature is caused by weather conditions. If heat results from a technological process, exceeding those values does not automatically prohibit work where technological considerations make compliance impossible.
What measures must employers introduce?
Once the lower thresholds are exceeded, employers must use suitable technical measures to reduce or limit temperature, or organisational measures that minimise the impact of heat on employees’ health.
Air conditioning is not mandatory. Possible measures include additional breaks, shorter working hours or reorganising work to reduce duties during the hottest part of the day.
How must heat-related procedures be agreed?
If an occupational health and safety committee operates at the employer, organisational measures must be consulted with employees through that committee. Under the Polish Labour Code, the committee is required for employers with more than 250 employees.
Without a committee, measures are determined under Article 237^11a of the Polish Labour Code and the employer must obtain the opinion of the preventive healthcare physician. Employees must then be informed.
Do the new rules replace the duty to provide drinks?
No. Employers are already required to provide drinks, among other cases, for employees working outdoors above 25°C and at workplaces where weather-related temperatures exceed 28°C. From 2027, the same thresholds may trigger both the existing drink requirement and the new occupational health and safety duties.
Before the changes take effect, employers should define temperature monitoring, responsibilities and procedures for 25°C, 28°C, 32°C and 35°C. Exclusions require careful reading: § 30a(8) excludes paragraph 1, not all new obligations.
Workplace temperature limits in Poland from 2027: labour law changes for employers.
PPWR in Poland has, as a general rule, applied since 12 August 2026. It covers all packaging and packaging waste. Businesses already need to verify chemical composition, conformity and documentation, while further rules on labelling, recyclability, recycled content, empty space and reuse will apply in stages.
In this article:
Which PPWR requirements already apply?
PPWR in Poland, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation, is Regulation (EU) 2025/40 and replaces Directive 94/62/EC. It covers packaging design, composition, labelling, documentation, placing packaging on the market, reuse and recycling.
The total concentration of lead, cadmium, mercury and hexavalent chromium in packaging or its components must not exceed 100 mg/kg. Food-contact packaging containing PFAS at concentrations equal to or above the PPWR limits may not be placed on the market.
Conformity assessment, technical documentation and the EU declaration of conformity are also relevant. An importer should verify that the manufacturer completed the required assessment and prepared the necessary documentation.
Which supply-chain roles are covered?
PPWR covers manufacturers, importers, distributors and producers for extended producer responsibility (EPR) purposes. One organisation may perform several roles depending on the product, packaging source, country of origin and sales market.
Companies therefore need to determine who is responsible for each item of packaging at each stage of the supply chain. For importers of finished packaged products from outside the EU, missing supplier information can affect whether a product may be placed on the market.
Which requirements will apply later?
Design-for-recycling criteria are to apply from 1 January 2030 or 24 months after the relevant delegated acts enter into force, whichever is later.
Harmonised labels providing information on material composition are to be introduced from 12 August 2028 or 24 months after the relevant implementing act enters into force, whichever is later.
For grouped, transport and e-commerce packaging, the maximum empty-space ratio is to be limited to 50% from 1 January 2030 or three years after the relevant implementing acts enter into force, whichever is later. PPWR also introduces minimum recycled-content levels for certain plastic packaging and reuse targets for selected categories.
How should companies prepare for PPWR?
Key steps include:
- identifying relevant packaging categories,
- determining the company’s PPWR role for individual product flows,
- reviewing supplier documentation and material-composition data,
- assigning responsibility for technical documentation and conformity assessment,
- identifying packaging that will require later changes,
- incorporating new requirements into product design and supplier negotiations.
For larger organisations, a major challenge may be the absence of a complete packaging database covering different companies, countries and product lines. Businesses should therefore meet requirements already in force while preparing their packaging portfolios for later PPWR stages.
PPWR in Poland: what companies need to know about EU packaging rules
EU Inc. is a proposed EU-wide limited liability company form intended to harmonise core corporate rules across Member States. The proposal includes online registration within 48 hours for up to EUR 100, no minimum share capital and a digital share register. National tax, employment and other local obligations would continue to apply in Poland.
In this article:
What is EU Inc. and could it be registered in Poland?
EU Inc. would operate as an optional 28th legal regime alongside the 27 national systems. It would not replace existing Polish forms such as a limited liability company (spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością, sp. z o.o.) or a simple joint-stock company (prosta spółka akcyjna, PSA).
Under proposed Regulation COM(2026) 321, EU Inc. would have legal personality and limited shareholder liability. Founders could choose the Member State of registration, including Poland. Matters not harmonised at EU level would remain subject to the law of the registered office.
How would EU Inc. simplify company formation?
Under the fast-track procedure, company registration would be completed online within 48 hours at a maximum cost of EUR 100. No minimum share capital would be required, and capital could be set at EUR 0.
The proposal also provides for:
- a digital register and different classes of shares,
- investment instruments suitable for funding rounds,
- harmonised corporate documents,
- a central interface based on the Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS),
- the once-only principle, reducing repeated submission of registration data.
The European Commission estimates EU-wide administrative savings of EUR 328–440 million over 10 years, assuming approximately 308,000 companies use the regime.
Would EU Inc. harmonise taxes and employment rules?
No. The proposed harmonisation primarily concerns company law. Doing business in Poland would still require companies to assess tax residence, permanent establishments, value added tax (VAT), transfer pricing and taxation of local operations.
Businesses employing staff in Poland would also remain subject to applicable Polish labour law and social security requirements.
EU Inc. should therefore not be understood as a “register once and operate everywhere without local obligations” model.
Which businesses could benefit most?
The strongest case for EU Inc. is likely to arise where a business has a cross-border structure, investors from several countries, plans to enter additional EU markets or frequent funding rounds.
For a company operating only in Poland, the advantages over an established Polish sp. z o.o. or PSA may be limited. EU Inc. would not itself provide a lower corporate income tax (CIT) rate or remove Polish tax and employment obligations.
The proposal would also allow existing companies to form an EU Inc. through conversions, mergers or divisions. For domestic operations, at least two years must have passed since registration or the first two annual financial statements must have been approved.
When could EU Inc. become available?
The European Commission presented the proposal on 18 March 2026 under procedure 2026/0074(COD). EU Inc. cannot currently be registered in Poland or elsewhere in the EU.
EU institutions have indicated a political objective of reaching agreement by the end of 2026. However, the current proposal provides for the Regulation to apply only 12 months after its entry into force.
EU Inc. may therefore simplify European expansion in the future, but it is not currently a reason to delay an investment in Poland. The target operating model, taxation, employment, financing and regulatory environment remain key factors when selecting a company structure.
To choose an accounting firm in Poland, compare service scope, team experience, month-end closing, reporting, backup arrangements, liability insurance and data security before comparing fees. The lowest monthly price may not mean the lowest total cost.
In this article:
How should you choose an accounting firm in Poland?
When deciding how to choose an accounting firm in Poland, first define which processes will be outsourced and what financial information management needs. A small company needs a different model from a Polish subsidiary reporting to foreign headquarters, handling several currencies and following a group closing timetable.
The proposal should state who is responsible for bookkeeping, reconciliations, fixed assets, payments, financial statements and management reports. A broad promise of “comprehensive accounting” is not enough.
What should you verify before signing the agreement?
Focus on:
- team expertise – experience with similar companies, a named lead accountant, backup cover and escalation procedures;
- month-end close – deadlines, regular account reconciliations and reporting dates;
- international reporting – group reporting, chart-of-accounts mapping, intercompany reconciliations and cooperation with foreign finance teams or auditors;
- IT and data security – access rights, backups, data transfers, subcontractors and incident procedures;
- contract terms – core services, extra fees, limits, termination and data handover.
What formal requirements apply in Poland?
A business providing outsourced bookkeeping services must generally hold professional liability insurance. The minimum mandatory cover is EUR 10,000 per insured event. Larger companies should also assess the actual insured amount and scope of cover against the processes being outsourced.
A Polish Ministry of Finance accounting certificate is not mandatory. Since 10 August 2014, new certificates have no longer been issued. Current expertise, relevant client experience and quality-control procedures are more important selection criteria.
Outsourcing does not remove management’s statutory responsibility. Under Article 4(5) of the Polish Accounting Act, the head of the entity remains responsible for accounting obligations and supervision of the outsourced process.
How should KSeF access, security and costs be assessed?
For Poland’s National e-Invoicing System (KSeF), establish who retrieves and issues invoices, grants and revokes permissions, and removes access when the engagement ends. If the provider processes personal data for the client, the arrangement should comply with Article 28 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Compare total operating cost, not only the monthly fee. Price can be affected by transaction volumes, foreign-currency settlements, reporting, system integrations, audit support and client-side coordination.
A strong provider should pass four tests: compliance, delivery, control and continuity. Only then does a final price comparison become meaningful.
How to choose an accounting firm in Poland: key selection criteria.
An invoice mistakenly submitted to KSeF does not always have to be corrected to zero. Poland’s Ministry of Finance (MF) allows for no correction where the document in the National System of e-Invoices (KSeF) and the invoice issued earlier outside the system can clearly be identified as the same invoice. However, the Director of the National Revenue Information (KIS) required a zero correction in the ruling of 23 June 2026, ref. no. 0114-KDIP1-3.4012.298.2026.1.KP.
In this article:
Must an invoice mistakenly submitted to KSeF be corrected to zero?
There is no single rule for every case. The key question is whether the XML document submitted to KSeF is the same invoice that had already been issued and delivered to the customer outside the system.
When may a zero correction not be necessary?
Businesses should compare in particular:
- the issue date and invoice number,
- the date of supply of goods or services,
- the invoice line items,
- the total amount due.
If these elements match, the Ministry of Finance approach allows the documents to be treated as one invoice. This position is not a general tax ruling or official tax guidance.
What if the KSeF XML file differs from the original invoice?
Differences in the invoice number, dates, line items or amounts increase the risk that the KSeF document may be treated as another issued invoice. In that case, Article 108(1) of the Polish VAT Act may apply because it concerns the obligation to pay VAT shown on an issued invoice.
A zero correction is the more conservative option where two documents for the same transaction may remain in legal circulation.
Can an accepted KSeF invoice be deleted or edited?
No. Once an invoice has been accepted by KSeF and assigned a KSeF number, the taxpayer cannot independently delete, cancel or edit it. Errors must be corrected by the issuer through a corrective invoice.
KSeF checks whether the XML file complies with the required logical structure, but does not verify mathematical calculations.
What should a business do after an incorrect submission?
The business should stop further automatic submissions, determine the scale of the error, compare the documents, verify the VAT and accounting treatment, inform the customer about the risk of duplicate booking, and assess whether a zero corrective invoice is appropriate.
For ERP or accounting-system errors, the company should document the cause and change the configuration so historical invoices cannot re-enter the submission queue.
Is a zero correction the safer approach?
From a Polish tax-risk perspective, it is the more conservative approach, consistent with the KIS ruling of 23 June 2026. It is not automatically mandatory. The decision should reflect document consistency, duplicate-booking risk and evidence that the resubmission was purely technical.
VAT deduction on work clothing in Poland may be available without a company logo if the clothing genuinely serves a business purpose, is linked to VAT-taxable activities and is not used privately. In a ruling dated 23 January 2026, reference no. 0113-KDIPT1-1.4012.1056.2025.4.JK, the Director of the National Revenue Information (KIS, Polish: Krajowa Informacja Skarbowa) accepted a model based on distinctive company-related clothing, employer ownership, records and a return requirement.
In this article:
Can a business deduct VAT on work clothing without a logo?
Yes, in specific circumstances. The absence of a logo does not itself prevent VAT deduction. A distinctive design, cut or colour associated with the business may also help demonstrate that clothing has a genuine work-related character.
The fundamental requirement is a connection between the expenditure and VAT-taxable activities. Purchasing clothing simply because employees are expected to wear it at work is not enough.
What was decisive in the KIS ruling?
The case concerned office clothing for employees in direct contact with clients, including shirts, jackets, trousers, skirts, ties, belts and shoes. The garments were not to carry a logo, but were to have a distinctive design, cut and colour closely associated with the company.
The positive assessment was supported by the overall model:
- the clothing remained the employer’s property,
- private use was prohibited,
- workplace rules covered appearance, use, storage and care,
- the company kept records of clothing purchased and issued,
- employees had to return the clothing when employment ended.
Are workplace rules alone sufficient?
No. Written rules are only one part of the assessment and must reflect actual practice. If private use is formally prohibited but employees can freely take the clothing home and wear it outside work, the business-purpose argument becomes weaker.
The strongest position comes from consistency between business purpose, documentation and actual use.
When does the VAT risk increase?
Risk is higher where clothing resembles ordinary personal garments, no distinctive company features are defined, private use remains possible, or effective records and return procedures are missing.
A suit, shirt, jacket or pair of shoes is therefore not automatically eligible for VAT deduction. The company must show that the arrangement serves its VAT-taxable activities rather than an employee’s private wardrobe.
What about mixed activities and protection from the ruling?
For both VAT-taxable and VAT-exempt activities, the company should first test whether the expenditure can be directly attributed to activities carrying a deduction right. Otherwise, the rules for mixed activities apply.
The ruling of 23 January 2026 concerns a specific planned situation and does not automatically protect other businesses. Companies with material purchases or unusual arrangements should assess their own facts and may consider applying for their own individual tax ruling in Poland.
VAT deduction on work clothing in Poland without a logo – when is it possible?
Management board member B2B services in Poland may be treated as separate business activity if they are genuinely distinct from managing and representing the company. In its judgment of 8 April 2026, case no. III SA/Wa 2554/25, the Voivodeship Administrative Court (WSA) in Warsaw held that client acquisition and sales may constitute separate services. Key safeguards are a separate scope, arm’s-length remuneration, correct representation and evidence of actual performance.
In this article:
Can a management board member provide separate B2B services?
Yes, but an agreement and an invoice are not enough. Under Article 201 § 1 of the Polish Commercial Companies Code, the management board manages the company’s affairs and represents it. This does not make every activity performed by a board member a management duty.
The WSA challenged the Head of the National Revenue Administration (KAS – Krajowa Administracja Skarbowa), who had broadly treated the president’s services as management duties. The Court accepted that client acquisition, sales meetings, individual offers and maintaining customer relationships may be separate from the corporate function.
How should management duties and business services be separated?
The decisive factor is the actual nature of the activities, not the title of the agreement. Companies should verify whether:
- the same service could be purchased from an external provider,
- the scope is specific and does not cover managing or representing the company,
- remuneration is arm’s length and the service has a genuine commercial rationale,
- performance can be evidenced by reports, correspondence, activity records or sales documentation.
Where the board member is also a shareholder or another related-party relationship exists, transfer pricing rules may also require review.
Who should sign the agreement on behalf of the company?
Under Article 210 § 1 of the Code, a Polish limited liability company (sp. z o.o. – spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością) is represented in an agreement with a board member by the supervisory board or an attorney appointed by a shareholders’ resolution. If the sole shareholder is also the sole board member, Article 210 § 2 requires a notarial deed.
Issuing an invoice does not itself determine the correct tax treatment. The arrangement must first reflect genuinely separate services that are actually performed.
Does the ruling remove GAAR risk?
No. The ruling does not provide general protection for all B2B arrangements with management board members. If services exist only formally, lack commercial justification or the remuneration split is designed mainly to obtain a tax advantage, Poland’s General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR) under Article 119a of the Polish Tax Ordinance may still apply.
For a foreign management board member, the company should additionally analyse tax residence, the nature of both remuneration streams, where the services are performed and the applicable double taxation treaty.
Employee Capital Plans (Polish: Pracownicze Plany Kapitałowe, PPK) are generally mandatory for employers in Poland, although employees may opt out. Employers enrol eligible people, calculate contributions and transfer them by the 15th day of the following month. The minimum employer contribution is 1.5% of remuneration and may rise to 4%. In 2027, employers must also handle automatic PPK re-enrolment.
In this article:
Who must an employer enrol in PPK Poland?
People aged 18 to under 55 are enrolled automatically unless they opt out. People aged 55–69 may join only upon application; after age 70, a PPK participation agreement cannot be entered into.
Coverage depends on mandatory pension and disability insurance, not only on the contract type. A student under 26 on a mandate contract who is not subject to these insurance obligations is therefore not covered by PPK.
A participation agreement may be entered into after 14 days of employment and no later than the 10th day of the month following the month in which 90 days are completed. Employment with the same entity during the previous 12 months also counts.
How much does PPK cost an employer?
The employer’s basic contribution is 1.5% of remuneration. An additional contribution of up to 2.5% may increase the total rate to 4%. With a monthly contribution base of PLN 1,000,000, the employer cost ranges from PLN 15,000 to PLN 40,000.
Contributions must reach the financial institution by the 15th day of the following month. Employer-funded contributions are tax-deductible. For the employee, they are income subject to Polish Personal Income Tax (PIT) when transferred, but are excluded from social security and health insurance contributions.
PPK should therefore be treated as a recurring part of payroll in Poland, not as a one-off administrative task.
When can an employer be exempt from PPK?
Limited exemptions include certain micro-enterprises where all people under 55 have opted out and no eligible person aged 55–69 has applied to join.
An exemption may also apply to an Employee Pension Scheme (Polish: Pracowniczy Program Emerytalny, PPE) with a basic contribution of at least 3.5% and participation of at least 25%.
What changes with automatic re-enrolment in 2027?
Employers should inform affected people by the end of February 2027. Existing opt-outs expire then; a new declaration can take effect no earlier than 1 March 2027. Contributions resume from 1 April 2027 unless a new opt-out is submitted.
For people aged 55–69 before 1 April, contributions resume only upon request. No contributions are resumed for people who reach 70. The next automatic re-enrolment cycle is in 2031.
Which PPK errors create the highest risk?
Key risks include incorrect calculation of the 90-day period, misclassification of contractors, a wrong contribution base, late opt-out processing and failure to verify the transfer date.
Encouraging employees to opt out or failing to enter into a management agreement may trigger a fine of up to 1.5% of the previous year’s remuneration fund. Other infringements may be fined from PLN 1,000 to PLN 1,000,000.
From 7 August 2026, notices concerning a missing management agreement are made available through the payer’s account in the Social Insurance Institution (Polish: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych, ZUS) system. If uncollected, they are deemed served after 14 days; the entity then has 30 days to take the required action involving the Polish Development Fund (Polish: Polski Fundusz Rozwoju, PFR).
An in-minus corrective invoice in Poland generally requires the buyer to reduce input VAT in the period in which the correction is received, provided VAT from the original invoice has already been deducted. In its judgment of 24 March 2026, I FSK 1005/23, the Supreme Administrative Court of Poland (NSA) confirmed that the adjustment should not automatically be moved back to the original transaction period. From 1 February 2026, receipt of a structured corrective invoice in KSeF is generally linked to the date on which its KSeF number is assigned.
In this article:
When should the buyer reduce input VAT?
Where input VAT from the original invoice has already been deducted, the buyer should generally recognise the reduction in the period in which the in-minus corrective invoice in Poland is received. The original transaction date does not automatically determine the reporting period.
The NSA case concerned an invoice issued on 30 January 2013 and a correction received on 29 November 2018. It reduced the net amount by PLN 25,794,991.87 and VAT by PLN 5,932,848.13. The Court held that input VAT had to be reduced for November 2018, not for 2013.
What changed from 1 February 2026?
Article 86(19a) of the Polish VAT Act provides that, for an in-minus correction issued as a structured invoice, the buyer reduces input VAT in the settlement period in which it is received. Other forms and special procedures are governed by Articles 86(19aa)–86(19ad).
In KSeF, the receipt date is generally the date on which the KSeF number is assigned. If the number is assigned on 31 July, the invoice is normally treated as received in July even if accounting processes it in August.
Corrective invoices issued before 1 February 2026 remain subject to the transitional rules and the previous wording of Articles 29a and 86.
How does the rule work in practice?
A company deducted PLN 23,000 of input VAT in June 2026 and received a structured KSeF correction in July reducing VAT by PLN 4,600. It should reduce input VAT by PLN 4,600 in the July settlement, rather than amend June solely because the original deduction was made then.
If the original invoice has not yet been recognised, the reduction is taken into account when input VAT from that invoice is deducted.
What should be checked at month-end?
Month-end procedures should review documents available in KSeF, not only invoices passed to accounting through internal workflows. If a correction is identified after JPK_V7 has been submitted, the business should establish its legal receipt date and determine whether the records section and, where relevant, the declaration section must be amended.
Before posting the correction, the company should verify the original invoice, the VAT actually deducted and whether the correction has already been recognised. For very old documents, the limitation period also requires analysis. The NSA judgment does not mean that every corrective invoice can validly be issued after the original period has become time-barred.
In-minus VAT corrective invoice in Poland: when must the buyer reduce input VAT?
Employee commuting cost reimbursement in Poland generally creates taxable employment income when the employer pays a cash allowance or reimburses ordinary travel between home and a fixed workplace. The amount should be included in payroll and subject to PIT. Employer-organised transport by bus may qualify for a separate exemption under Article 21(1)(14a) of the Polish Personal Income Tax Act.
In this article:
When is employee commuting cost reimbursement taxable in Poland?
Employee commuting cost reimbursement in Poland was addressed by the Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 12 March 2026, case II FSK 775/23. A cash reimbursement of ordinary home-to-work commuting costs generally constitutes employment income because an expense normally borne by the employee is ultimately covered by the employer.
The case concerned a lump-sum allowance for employees commuting to a workplace with poor public transport access. The NSA held that a difficult location, shift work or the employer’s operational need to maintain staffing do not, by themselves, create a PIT exemption.
When can employer-organised transport be PIT-exempt?
The Polish Personal Income Tax Act provides an exemption for transport organised by the employer using a bus, defined as a vehicle designed to carry more than nine people including the driver.
Employers should therefore distinguish between:
- cash allowance or reimbursement – generally taxable employment income,
- employer-organised bus transport – may qualify for the statutory exemption,
- transport in a smaller vehicle – no automatic bus exemption; voluntariness, financial benefit and individual allocation of value should be assessed,
- business travel – subject to separate rules and not equivalent to an ordinary commute.
Can internal rules create a tax exemption?
No. A PIT exemption must result from a specific statutory provision. A remuneration policy, management board resolution or employment contract cannot create an exemption on its own.
Article 21(1)(23b) does not provide a general exemption for daily commuting to a fixed workplace. It concerns specific local journeys using an employee-owned vehicle where reimbursement follows from other legislation.
How should employers handle the benefit in payroll in Poland?
Where the reimbursement is taxable, the employer should:
- add its value to the employee’s other employment income,
- calculate and withhold the PIT advance payment,
- record the amount in payroll documentation and the employee’s PIT-11 information return,
- analyse social security contribution consequences separately.
Judgment II FSK 775/23 concerns PIT and does not directly determine ZUS treatment. Social security exclusions for free or partly paid transport should not automatically be applied to a cash lump-sum reimbursement.
Before launching an employee transport programme, HR, finance and payroll teams should define the benefit model, vehicle type, eligible employees, evidence of use and valuation rules.
Employee commuting cost reimbursement in Poland: when does it create taxable income?
To verify an audit firm in Poland before making an appointment, a company should review both the firm itself and the individual designated as the key statutory auditor. The firm should appear on the official list of audit firms, while the statutory auditor should be listed in the register maintained by the Polish Chamber of Statutory Auditors (PIBR). Companies should also examine penalties published by the Polish Agency for Audit Oversight (PANA), auditor independence, sector experience, access to specialists and the proposed organisation of the audit. Registration confirms that the firm is authorised to provide audit services, but it does not establish whether it is suitable for a particular company.
The importance of properly verifying an audit firm follows directly from the purpose of the audit. A financial statement audit in Poland is intended to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. The statutory auditor then expresses an opinion on whether the statements present a true and fair view of the entity’s financial position, financial performance and results. Audit quality, however, depends on more than the formal qualifications of the person signing the audit report.
For management boards and CFOs, sector knowledge, independence, team continuity, the ability to meet deadlines and the way significant findings are communicated are equally important.
The wrong choice may delay the approval of the financial statements, require the same data to be prepared repeatedly, create a backlog of questions at the end of the audit or force management to address issues that could have been identified much earlier.
In this article:
Does a company appoint an auditor or an audit firm in Poland?
In business discussions, companies usually refer to appointing an auditor or statutory auditor. From a legal perspective, however, the company appoints an audit firm and subsequently enters into an agreement with that firm for the audit of its financial statements.
The audit firm designates a key statutory auditor who has primary responsibility for the engagement. The statutory auditor who signs the audit report also has the status of a key statutory auditor.
This means that two levels should be examined before the appointment:
- the audit firm as the contracting party and the entity responsible for the audit;
- the key statutory auditor and the other members of the audit team.
The audit firm entering into the agreement is responsible to the audited entity. The reputation of an individual partner is therefore not sufficient if the company does not understand which entity will perform the engagement, who will be assigned to the team and how the audit will be organised.
How can a company verify an auditor’s authorisation in Poland?
The initial verification should cover the official registers that are publicly available in Poland.
| What should be checked? | Where should it be verified? | What should the company review? |
|---|---|---|
| Audit firm | Official list of audit firms | registration number, full legal name, address, legal form and current status |
| Key statutory auditor | PIBR register of statutory auditors | full name, registration number and current professional status |
| Auditor’s relationship with the firm | List of audit firms and PIBR register | whether the named individual is employed by or otherwise associated with the firm |
| Network membership | Information included in the list of audit firms | name of the network and associated entities |
| Administrative penalties | PANA list of penalties | nature of the infringement, date of the decision and penalty imposed |
| Civil liability insurance | Document provided by the bidder | insurance period and whether the coverage includes the planned audit activities |
The list of audit firms includes, among other information, the registration number, company details, information concerning owners and governing bodies, the names of statutory auditors associated with the firm, branch addresses and information about network membership.
The register of statutory auditors is maintained by the National Council of Statutory Auditors. Individuals can be searched by surname, registration number or associated audit firm.
The current list of audit firms and a link to the register of statutory auditors are also made available by the Polish Agency for Audit Oversight (PANA).
Is registration on the Polish list of audit firms sufficient?
No. Registration confirms that an entity is authorised to provide audit services in Poland, but it does not demonstrate that the firm has the experience and resources required to audit a particular company.
Formal verification is the first stage of the appointment process, not the final one. Two properly registered firms may differ significantly in terms of:
- experience in the relevant industry;
- the size and continuity of the audit team;
- access to tax and IT specialists;
- knowledge of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS);
- experience in auditing corporate groups;
- organisation of document and data exchange;
- availability of the partner responsible for the engagement.
Registration also provides no indication of what day-to-day cooperation will look like. A poorly organised audit generates not only the audit firm’s fee, but also additional internal costs for accounting, controlling, tax, IT and management teams.
From the audited company’s perspective, an effective audit should be transparent, predictable and proportionate to the actual risks. The client should know who is responsible for each area, what information must be prepared and when identified issues will be communicated.
How can a company verify whether an audit firm has been penalised in Poland?
PANA publishes a list of administrative penalties imposed on audit firms. As a general rule, this information remains publicly available for five years after the relevant decision becomes final. The list describes the infringement and the penalty imposed. Where the infringement relates to a statutory audit, it may also indicate whether the audit report complied with statutory requirements.
A penalty should not be assessed without examining its context. An administrative omission should be evaluated differently from an infringement concerning auditor independence, the quality of audit documentation or the content of an audit report.
Companies should check:
- what the infringement specifically concerned;
- when it occurred;
- whether it was an isolated or systemic issue;
- what remedial measures the firm implemented;
- whether the penalty related to the quality of a particular audit.
It should also be remembered that the penalised firm is not identified in full in every published case. The absence of a firm’s name from the list should therefore not be treated as conclusive confirmation that the firm has never been subject to proceedings.
An audit firm may be penalised, among other reasons, for breaching independence requirements, failing to complete the required assessments before accepting an engagement, irregularities in an audit report, non-compliance with rotation rules or failure to maintain the required insurance.
How should auditor independence be assessed in Poland?
An auditor should be independent of the audited entity both in fact and in the perception of an objective, informed third party.
The audit firm, members of the audit team and other persons who can influence the outcome of the audit must not participate in the audited entity’s decision-making. An audit should not be performed where financial, personal, business or employment relationships create an unacceptable threat to independence.
Before making an appointment, the company should ask the audit firm:
- whether it has previously provided accounting, tax, implementation or advisory services to the company;
- whether such services have been provided to other entities within the corporate group;
- whether any audit team members were previously employed by the audited company;
- whether personal or business relationships exist with management board members;
- which safeguards will be used to protect independence;
- whether entities belonging to the same network will participate in the engagement.
Before accepting or continuing an engagement, the audit firm and the key statutory auditor must assess and document compliance with the independence requirements. Audit team members submit the relevant declarations before the audit begins.
For international groups, the assessment should not be limited to the Polish company. Services provided by foreign entities belonging to the same network may also affect the independence assessment.
How should a company evaluate an auditor’s industry experience?
Industry knowledge is not merely a matter of convenience for the client. It affects how risks are identified, how audit procedures are planned and how unusual transactions are assessed. The relevant areas will differ between manufacturing, real estate, retail, technology and international trading companies.
In a manufacturing company, the auditor should understand areas including:
- the calculation of production costs;
- the valuation of inventories and work in progress;
- the treatment of production variances;
- physical inventory procedures;
- impairment of machinery and inventories.
For an international group, relevant matters may include consolidation packages, differences between Polish accounting rules and group accounting policies, related-party transactions, foreign currencies and reporting deadlines imposed by the parent company.
Before making an appointment, the company should request information about:
- the number of audits completed in the relevant sector;
- the experience of the key statutory auditor;
- examples of typical risks identified in comparable entities;
- experience in auditing businesses of a similar size;
- familiarity with the accounting system used by the company;
- experience in group reporting.
A general statement that the firm understands the industry is not sufficient. A credible response should refer to specific processes, financial statement items and risks characteristic of the client’s operations.
Does the entire audit team need to be assessed?
Yes. The partner or key statutory auditor does not perform every audit procedure personally. The quality and efficiency of the engagement depend on the entire team.
During the tender process, the company should establish:
- who will act as the key statutory auditor;
- who will manage the day-to-day audit work;
- how many people will be assigned to the team;
- what experience the team members have;
- whether the team composition is expected to remain stable;
- how much time the partner will devote to the engagement;
- who will make decisions on disputed or complex matters;
- who will replace key team members if they become unavailable.
Before accepting the engagement, the audit firm must assess whether it has competent staff, sufficient time and the other resources required to perform the audit properly.
Access to specialists is particularly important in areas that cannot be assessed reliably using standard accounting expertise alone. This may include valuations, taxation, IT systems, financial instruments, cybersecurity or sustainability reporting.
How should the organisation and timetable of an audit in Poland be verified?
The organisation of the audit should be assessed during the tender process. The auditor should present not only the proposed fee, but also a clear delivery model.
The proposal should explain:
- when audit planning will begin;
- whether an interim audit is planned;
- when the auditor will attend the physical inventory count;
- when the list of required documents will be provided;
- how questions will be raised and tracked;
- when management will be informed of significant issues;
- the planned date for issuing the audit report.
The auditor should take account of the year-end closing calendar, group reporting deadlines, tax filings and the availability of management board members.
A timetable that does not reflect the company’s operational reality may result in most audit questions being raised during the busiest period for the finance department.
The company should also determine whether the proposed data exchange platform supports document version control, question tracking and secure access management. Technology should reduce repeated requests and manually prepared schedules. References to automation or artificial intelligence alone do not demonstrate that the audit process will be efficient.
A financial statement audit in Poland should be planned sufficiently early. HLB Poland can prepare an audit scope and timetable reflecting the scale of the company’s operations, its year-end closing deadlines and its group reporting obligations.
Must an audit firm in Poland hold civil liability insurance?
Yes. An audit firm performing audit activities in Poland must hold civil liability insurance.
The insurance obligation arises no later than the day before the firm begins performing audit activities and continues until the firm is removed from the official list. Before entering into an agreement, the company may request current evidence of insurance. The verification should cover the insurance period and confirm whether the policy includes the activities covered by the proposed engagement.
Insurance does not replace a quality assessment of the firm, but it is one of the basic elements of formal due diligence.
Who appoints an audit firm in a Polish company?
As a general rule, the audit firm is appointed by the body responsible for approving the financial statements, unless the articles of association, statutes or other binding regulations assign this authority to another body. The head of the entity, as defined under Polish accounting law, cannot make the appointment independently.
In a Polish limited liability company, the competent body will usually be the shareholders’ meeting, unless the articles of association assign this authority, for example, to the supervisory board. The management board may conduct a tender, collect information and negotiate the commercial terms. The formal appointment must nevertheless be made by the competent corporate body. The head of the entity then enters into the agreement with the selected audit firm.
The agreement should be signed sufficiently early to allow the auditor to attend the physical inventory count of significant assets. In the case of an initial agreement for a statutory audit, the engagement period cannot be shorter than two years.
Further information about the process is available in the article Audit in Poland: a step-by-step financial statement audit guide.
What additional auditor checks apply to public-interest entities in Poland?
Public-interest entities, including selected financial market entities and securities issuers, are subject to additional requirements concerning auditor appointment, independence and rotation.
In such cases, the company should verify:
- whether the firm performs audits of public-interest entities;
- whether the appointment complies with the entity’s internal policy and procedure;
- the recommendation issued by the audit committee;
- the scope of non-audit services;
- the length of the existing relationship with the firm and the key statutory auditor;
- compliance with mandatory rotation requirements.
The standard maximum period for which a public-interest entity may continuously engage the same audit firm is ten years. A longer period is possible only in the circumstances specified in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014.
The key statutory auditor may not perform the statutory audit of the same entity for more than five years. The individual may participate in the audit again only after a cooling-off period of at least three years.
What questions should a company ask an auditor before appointment?
Before submitting a recommendation to the corporate body responsible for the appointment, the company should obtain answers to the following questions:
- What is the firm’s registration number on the official list of audit firms?
- Who will act as the key statutory auditor?
- What experience does the proposed team have in our industry?
- How many comparable audits has the team completed in recent years?
- Has the firm or its network provided any services to our group?
- How will the firm confirm and protect its independence?
- How large will the team be, and what will the partner’s role involve?
- Does the firm have access to tax, IT and valuation specialists?
- What is the proposed timetable, and when will the document request list be provided?
- How will questions be raised, assigned and monitored?
- What is included in the quoted fee?
- Which circumstances may result in additional fees?
- Does the firm hold current civil liability insurance?
- How will audit documentation and company data be protected and stored?
- When will management be informed of significant irregularities or control issues?
The answers should be documented in a tender evaluation sheet. This allows the company to compare candidates using consistent criteria and provides a documented basis for the recommendation made to the appointing body.
How should a statutory auditor in Poland be verified? Summary
The process should begin by checking the audit firm on the official Polish list and verifying the key statutory auditor in the PIBR register. The company should then assess independence, industry experience, team composition, available resources, the proposed timetable and the commercial terms.
The assessment should combine three perspectives:
- formal verification – authorisation, registers, penalties and insurance;
- technical verification – sector experience and access to specialists;
- operational verification – timetable, communication and organisation of data exchange.
Only this combined assessment can establish whether a firm is not only formally authorised to conduct a financial statement audit in Poland, but can also complete the engagement on time, independently and without placing an unnecessary burden on the organisation.
Companies looking for an audit firm can review the scope of HLB Poland’s financial statement audit services. Discussing the business structure, reporting deadlines and key risks at an early stage allows the audit scope and timetable to be defined appropriately.
Choosing a limited liability company vs limited partnership in Poland means balancing stronger asset protection and easier investor entry against flexible profit allocation and the general partner’s CIT credit. A limited liability company usually suits scalable or higher-risk operations. A limited partnership may fit a founder-led model, but liability and ZUS costs must be calculated.
In this article:
What are the main differences?
A Polish limited liability company has separate legal personality, is managed by a management board and requires minimum capital of PLN 5,000.
A limited partnership requires a general partner and a limited partner, has no minimum capital and is generally managed by the general partner. Both structures must keep full accounting books.
Which structure protects private assets better?
Shareholders of a limited liability company are generally not liable for company debts. Management board members may face personal liability if enforcement against the company is ineffective, including under Article 299 of the Polish Commercial Companies Code.
In a limited partnership, the general partner has unlimited liability. The limited partner is liable up to the agreed amount, reduced by the contribution made.
With a liability amount of PLN 100,000 and a contribution of PLN 40,000, the potential exposure is PLN 60,000.
How are profits taxed?
Both entities pay CIT at 9% or 19%. In 2026, the small-taxpayer thresholds are:
- PLN 8,517,000 in previous-year sales;
- PLN 8,431,000 in current-year revenue.
For PLN 1 million of profit distributed to an individual, the simplified combined burden in a limited liability company is 26.29% at 9% CIT or 34.39% at 19% CIT.
A general partner may offset tax by the corresponding share of CIT paid by the partnership. Combined taxation may be approximately 17.29% at 9% CIT or 19% at 19% CIT.
An individual limited partner may qualify for a 50% exemption, capped at PLN 60,000 per year from each partnership, subject to statutory exclusions.
How do ZUS contributions affect the choice?
An individual partner in a limited partnership is generally subject to contributions. In 2026, minimum monthly social contributions are:
- PLN 1,788.29 without voluntary sickness insurance;
- PLN 1,926.76 with voluntary sickness insurance.
The health contribution in the model described is PLN 830.58 per month.
Holding shares in a multi-shareholder limited liability company does not itself create a social insurance obligation. A sole shareholder is treated differently.
Which structure supports growth?
A limited liability company is usually better for financing rounds, share sales, foreign investors and professional management. Voting rights, transfer restrictions and exit rules can be defined clearly.
A limited partnership offers more flexibility in allocating profits and separating operational control from capital participation. Transferring a partner’s rights is less straightforward and usually requires the consent of the other partners.
How should founders decide?
Before company registration in Poland, founders should compare potential liabilities, personal exposure, distribution and reinvestment plans, total tax and ZUS costs, financing needs and future ownership changes.
A limited liability company is usually safer for higher-risk or growth-oriented businesses. A limited partnership requires carefully designed partner roles and a full cost simulation.
This article was written by the getsix® Editorial Teamgetsix® provides accounting, tax advisory, HR and payroll, and business consulting services, supporting companies operating in Poland. The getsix® Editorial Team prepares practical information that makes Polish accounting, tax, and HR and payroll matters easier to understand.
KSeF invoices for services supplied abroad may be mandatory even when the service is taxable outside Poland. The decisive factors are the applicable invoicing rules, the parties’ status, who accounts for VAT and statutory exclusions. A KIS ruling dated 22 June 2026 confirmed the requirement for design services connected with German properties where the German customer accounted for VAT under reverse charge.
In this article:
When does a cross-border service invoice fall within KSeF?
A business should determine:
- the place of supply for VAT purposes,
- whether Polish invoicing rules apply,
- whether the supplier is subject to KSeF and no exclusion applies.
For most B2B services, the place of supply is the customer’s establishment or the relevant fixed establishment. Separate rules cover services directly connected with a specific property.
Article 106a of the Polish VAT Act may apply Polish invoicing rules even where the service is taxable abroad. For another EU Member State, this may occur where a Polish taxable person supplies the service, the customer accounts for VAT and no self-billing arrangement is used.
What did the KIS ruling of 22 June 2026 confirm?
Individual ruling no. 0112-KDIL1-3.4012.251.2026.2.ŁW concerned a Polish company preparing structural designs for properties in Germany. Under Article 28e of the Polish VAT Act, Germany was treated as the place of supply and the invoices were marked reverse charge.
KIS applied Article 106a(2)(a) of the Polish VAT Act. The supplier was established in Poland, the German customer accounted for VAT and the Polish company issued the documents. The invoices therefore had to follow Polish rules, including issuance through KSeF.
The conclusion does not cover every cross-border service automatically. A reverse charge annotation alone does not determine the KSeF obligation, foreign VAT registration, whether local VAT is due or which additional details foreign law requires.
When is mandatory KSeF excluded?
Exclusions include:
- self-billing by a foreign customer without a Polish tax identification number,
- invoices issued to foreign consumers,
- a foreign business registered for Polish VAT but without an establishment or participating fixed establishment in Poland.
Until 31 December 2026, a transitional deferral applies where monthly gross sales documented by invoices otherwise subject to KSeF do not exceed PLN 10,000. The invoice that exceeds the threshold and all subsequent invoices must be issued through KSeF. The business cannot return to the simplification later.
How should the invoice reach a foreign customer?
In online mode, the supplier issues the structured invoice, waits for the KSeF identification number, generates a visualisation with the required QR code and sends it to the customer, for example as a PDF. Under an applicable offline mode, the document may be delivered earlier under that procedure.
Text fields may be completed in English, but a separate second invoice should not be created. The PDF must reflect the XML data submitted to KSeF.
Businesses providing recurring international services should use a VAT compliance decision matrix covering the customer’s country and tax status, the type and place of supply, who accounts for VAT, possible foreign registration and the delivery method.
Do invoices for services supplied abroad have to be issued through Poland’s KSeF?
July 2026 brought new AI-content duties, broader PIP inspection powers, preparations for KSeF references in split payments, a narrower MDR regime and greater risk around 100% VAT deductions for company cars. The key dates are 2 August 2026, 1 October 2026 and 1 January 2027.
For businesses managing accounting in Poland, payroll, tax and corporate compliance, records must reflect actual operations as authorities increasingly combine data from different systems.
In this article:
What AI Act duties apply from 2 August 2026?
Article 50 covers the marking of synthetic content, deepfakes and certain public-interest texts. Providers of generative tools must use machine-readable marking, while companies publishing content remain responsible for visible disclosure.
A transition until 2 December 2026 applies to certain systems already on the market. Fines may reach EUR 15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover.
Companies should map their AI use, define disclosure rules and appoint a person responsible for approval and documentation.
Read more: AI Act transparency obligations in Poland from 2 August 2026.
How did PIP inspections change on 8 July?
PIP can conduct remote checks, select entities analytically, exchange more information with ZUS and the tax administration, and challenge sham civil-law contracts or B2B arrangements.
Fines increased to PLN 2,000–60,000, rising to PLN 90,000 for a repeat offence within two years. Employment documents should match how work is actually performed.
Read more: PIP inspections in Poland: new rules from 8 July 2026.
How will KSeF change split payments from 1 January 2027?
For a single structured invoice, the payment message will use the KSeF number. For batch payments, a collective identifier generated by KSeF will replace the list of invoice numbers.
Mandatory split payment still applies to transactions between taxable persons above PLN 15,000 involving goods or services listed in Annex 15 to the VAT Act. The mechanism has been extended through 2028.
Businesses should test their accounting, payment-approval and e-banking integrations.
Read more: Split payment mechanism and KSeF invoices in Poland.
What changes in MDR reporting from 1 October 2026?
MDR will generally cover only cross-border arrangements. Domestic schemes, VAT and excise will leave the scope. The supporter role, mandatory internal procedure and MDR-2 form will be removed.
MDR-3 will normally be filed annually by the end of the fourth month after year-end and may be signed by a proxy. Some duties due by 30 October 2026 must still follow the former rules.
The maximum fine is 720 daily rates, theoretically up to PLN 46,137,600.
Read more: MDR changes in Poland 2026: what companies must do.
When is a 100% VAT deduction for a company car at risk?
Full recovery requires exclusive business use, timely VAT-26 filing, reliable mileage records and an effectively enforced ban on private journeys.
VAT-26 must be filed by the 25th day of the following month, no later than the date the VAT records are submitted. Authorities can compare mileage logs with automatic number plate recognition data.
Discrepancies or even one private trip may reduce the deduction to 50%, with interest and possible fiscal-penal consequences.
Read more: VAT deduction for company cars in Poland.
The basic employer burden is approximately 20.48% of gross salary in Poland and 21.27% in Germany. Germany usually costs more once accident insurance, U1, U2 and the insolvency levy are added. In cross-border employment, employers cannot choose the cheaper system; the applicable legislation is confirmed by an A1 certificate.
In this article:
Which contributions does the employer finance?
For standard employment and payroll in Poland, the employer finances part of the old-age and disability pension contributions, the full accident insurance contribution and payments to the Labour Fund, Solidarity Fund and Guaranteed Employee Benefits Fund.
The typical burden is 20.48% of gross salary, assuming a 1.67% accident insurance rate and an obligation to pay the employment-related funds. This excludes Employee Capital Plans (PPK).
The employee finances the 9% health insurance contribution, although the employer calculates, withholds and transfers it to ZUS.
In Germany, the employer co-finances pension, health, unemployment and long-term care insurance. The basic share outside Saxony is approximately 21.27%, assuming an average Zusatzbeitrag of 3.13%. Employers must also budget for:
- the 0.15% insolvency levy,
- statutory accident insurance,
- U1 and U2 levies set by the employee’s health insurance fund.
What is the cost at the average salary?
At the 2025 Polish average gross salary of PLN 8,903.56, employer-financed contributions amount to approximately PLN 1,823.45, bringing the monthly employment cost to around PLN 10,727.01.
With the basic 1.5% employer PPK contribution, the cost rises to approximately PLN 10,860.56.
At the 2025 German average gross salary of EUR 4,851, the basic employer contributions are approximately EUR 1,031.57. After the insolvency levy, the total monthly salary cost reaches around EUR 5,889.84, before accident insurance and the U1 and U2 levies.
How do contribution ceilings and deadlines differ?
In Poland, the 2026 annual ceiling for old-age and disability pension contributions is PLN 282,600. Contributions are paid by the 5th, 15th or 20th day of the following month, depending on the payer.
Germany applies monthly ceilings of EUR 8,450 for pension and unemployment insurance and EUR 5,812.50 for health and long-term care insurance.
Contributions are due on the third-last bank working day of the current month. Employers must therefore estimate the liability before payroll is fully closed and reflect the earlier payment in cash-flow planning.
Which system applies to cross-border employees?
A cross-border employee is generally covered by the legislation of only one country. An employee posted from Poland to Germany may remain in the Polish system for up to 24 months if the EU posting conditions are met. The applicable legislation is evidenced by an A1 certificate.
The A1 certificate is not a tool for selecting the cheaper system. Employers must assess the actual working arrangement, posting duration, work in multiple countries, contribution bases, ceilings and additional payroll costs before hiring.
Social security costs in Poland and Germany: a 2026 employer comparison